Modus operandi of Communities of Practice

Zsuzsánna E. Horváth


The changes in technology and the advancements of the World Wide Web have resulted in a different way in which people interact, and locate, and share information. Virtual communities connect people from different geographic regions and allow for the exchange of ideas among a broader range of professional. Communities of Practice, despite their recent conception, have gained tremendous importance in educational settings. 

This paper will present the types of COPs (virtual and face-to-face), pointing out the characteristics of both. It will discuss the advantages and disadvantages and propose a merged model drawing on the advantages of both. Special attention will be laid on the issue of ‘trust’, as a building block of the successful cooperation between the members of the COPs.

Full Text:




Abrams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E. & Levin, D.Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17 (4), 64-77. doi: 10.5465/AME.2003.11851845

Allard, C.C., Goldblatt, P.F., Kemball, J.I., Kendrick, S.A., Millen, J. & Smith, D.M. (2007). Becoming a reflective community of practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 8 (3), 299-314. doi: 10.1080/14623940701424801

Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10 (4), 541-554. doi: 10.1177/1523422308319536

Ardichvili, A., Page, V. & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (1), 64-77. doi:10.1108/13673270310463626

Bagozzi, R.P. & Dholakia, U.M (2002). Intentional social interaction in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (2), 2-12. doi: 10.1002/dir.10006

Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., et al. (2004). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Paper presented at the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Nov. 6-12, Chicago. Retrieved from

Byington, T. (2011). Communities of practice: using blogs to increase collaboration. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46 (5), 280-291. doi: 10.1177/1053451210395384

Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H. & Wang, E.T.G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision

Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001

Clark, M. (2009). The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2333-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.001

Clouder, D.L., Goodman, S., Bluteau, P., Jackson, A., Davies, B. & Merriman (2011). An investigation of “agreement” in the context of interprofessional discussion online: A “netiquette” of interperprofessional learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25 (2), 112-118. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.500445

Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31 (6), 527-540. doi: 10.1177/0165551505057016

CPsquare-The Community of Practice on community practices: Our vision. Retrieved January 11, 2018 from

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32 (5), 554-571. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Ellis, J., Arnone, M., Levinson, N., & Cogburn, D. L. (2014). Evaluating the Role of Face-to Face Residencies in Cross-National, Accessible Cyberlearning (pp. 62–71). IEEE.

Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2014). Blogging through the music student teaching experience: Developing virtual communities of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(1), 91–105.

Flatley, M.E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68 (1), 77-80.

Friend, M., and Cook, L., (2013). Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals, Pearson, 7th Edition.

Garavan, T.N., Carbery, R. & Murphy, E. (2007). Managing intentionally created communities of practice for knowledge sourcing across organisational boundaries: insights on the role of the CoP manager. The Learning Organization, 14 (1), 34-49. doi:


Hsu, M.H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.H. & Chang, C.M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2), 153-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003

Jarvenpaa, S.L. & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10 (6), 791-815. Retrieved from

Johnson, C.M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45-60. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1

Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral articipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leimeister, J.M., Ebner, W. & Krcmar, H. (2005). Design, implementation and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS), 21 (4), 101-135. Retrieved from

Lin, M.J., Hung, S.W. & Chen, C.J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (4), 929-939. doi:


Martin-Niemi, F. & Greatbanks, R. (2010). The ba of blogs: Enabling conditions for knowledge conversation in blog communities. VINE, 40 (1) 7-23. doi: 10.1108/03055721011024892

McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., Eberhardt, J., Koehler, M. J., & Lundeberg, M. A. (2013).Virtual Professional Learning Communities: Teachers’ Perceptions of Virtual Versus Face-to-Face Professional Development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 267–277.

Nistor, N., Daxecker, I., Stanciu, D., & Diekamp, O. (2015). Sense of community in academic communities of practice: predictors and effects. Higher Education, 69(2), 257–273.

Pan, S.L. & Leidner, D.E. (2003). Bridging communities with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12 (1), 71-78. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00023-9

Phang, Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(10), 721–747.

Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6 (1), 3-16. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3

Sousa, S.C., Lamas, D. & Dias, P. (2011). The interrelation between communities, trust and their online social patterns. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 980-986. doi: 10.1109/DASC.2011.162

Swan, K., & Shih, L.F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9, 115-136. Retrieved from

Wasko, M.M. & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (1-2), 155-173. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7

Wegener, R. & Leimeister, J.M. (2012). Virtual learning communities: success factors and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL), 4 (5/6), 383-397. doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051814

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7 (2), 225-246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002

Yuki, M., Maddux, W.M., Brewer, M.B. & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (1), 48-62. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271305



  • There are currently no refbacks.